Collaborative Planning for the Campaign
The previous article made the point that a whole-campus campaign leads to a successful campaign. It follows that the campaign planning or steering needs to seek input from the whole campus, as well as external stakeholders (business leaders and key donors). If the campaign goals are set in a conversation that only involves a few people, the campaign will run several risks: The campaign priorities may not accurately reflect the actual needs and priorities of the academic enterprise Limited campus input during the planning may lead to limited campus involvement during the execution of the campaign (as the campus will feel little ownership of it) Limited donor input during the planning may lead to a one-sidedness in later conversations with donors (as campus representatives approach donors with projects to fund, in which donors themselves feel little investment) It is critical to structure the committee and the planning process in a way that invites input and engagement from a broad range of stakeholders. Co-Chairing the Committee Santa Ono is a strong advocate for the provost taking a lead role on the campaign planning committee. In fact, at the University of Cincinnati, which is in the late stages of its very successful […]