Executive Summary: What We’ve Learned About Task Forces and Committees in Higher Education
<- back to the main page of this report by Amit Mrig (Academic Impressions) and Patrick Sanaghan (The Sanaghan Group) The Scope of the Opportunity Committees and task forces are ubiquitous in higher education, yet, very limited attention is invested to help asses or improve their effectiveness. Whether mandated through shared governance structures or because of noble intentions for participative decision making, task forces and committees abound. In fact, in our survey of 300 higher-ed professionals, approximately 35% of respondents currently serve on 5 committees or more. If the average committee work consumes one hour a week (which is a low estimate when you consider the pre-work, research/preparatory work, meeting time, communication, off-line meetings, etc.), then, easily, more than 10% of our time is being invested here. If we’re spending more than 10% of our time, the work must be important. And indeed most of it is—at least in theory. Some of the institution’s most critical needs—from student retention to strategic planning to hiring—are managed via committees and task forces. Despite noble intentions and charters that are mission-critical, big questions remain as to how effective these groups are. In our same survey, respondents gave an overall effectiveness score of 6.72 […]

